Spring Break
Prof. studies nuclear effects on major cities
Univ. 'place to be'
WHITNEY HOMANS
Issue date: 4/3/07 Section: News
- Page 1 of 2 next >
American cities, including Atlanta, would be devastated by even a small nuclear attack due to insufficient preparation and concentration of medical facilities in downtown areas, according to a study conducted by University professors.
Cham Dallas, professor of pharmaceutical and biomedical sciences, and William Bell, senior research scientist in the College of Public Health, looked at the effects of a 20 kiloton and a 550 kiloton nuclear weapon detonation on New York, Washington D.C., Chicago and Atlanta.
The devices dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki during World War II were approximately 10 - 15 kilotons. A terrorist faction or countries with nuclear capabilities, such as North Korea or Iran, could produce a 20 kiloton weapon, Dallas said.
A 550 kiloton device is about the average strength of the weapons found in Russia during the Cold War, he said.
"Atlanta is much better off than other cities in hospital preparedness," he said, due to the many well-equipped medical facilities in the suburbs.
But the results of the study showed that all of the studied cities - and the country as a whole - would be made most vulnerable by the loss of medical buildings and supplies in case of an attack.
For example, a small nuclear attack would produce mass fires surrounding the point of detonation, resulting in possibly hundreds of thousands of burn victims in need of immediate care, according to the study, which was published last month in the International Journal of Health Geographics.
The U.S. has approximately 1,500 beds available for burn victims, and "most of those beds are already occupied," the study said.
All of the hospitals in downtown areas would be destroyed by the immediate blast, causing an overflow of patients at the ones left standing.
Scared yet?
There also would be a severe lack of respirators, which tens of thousands of victims would need. More importantly, there would be massive displacement of medically-trained professionals, Dallas said.
Cham Dallas, professor of pharmaceutical and biomedical sciences, and William Bell, senior research scientist in the College of Public Health, looked at the effects of a 20 kiloton and a 550 kiloton nuclear weapon detonation on New York, Washington D.C., Chicago and Atlanta.
The devices dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki during World War II were approximately 10 - 15 kilotons. A terrorist faction or countries with nuclear capabilities, such as North Korea or Iran, could produce a 20 kiloton weapon, Dallas said.
A 550 kiloton device is about the average strength of the weapons found in Russia during the Cold War, he said.
"Atlanta is much better off than other cities in hospital preparedness," he said, due to the many well-equipped medical facilities in the suburbs.
But the results of the study showed that all of the studied cities - and the country as a whole - would be made most vulnerable by the loss of medical buildings and supplies in case of an attack.
For example, a small nuclear attack would produce mass fires surrounding the point of detonation, resulting in possibly hundreds of thousands of burn victims in need of immediate care, according to the study, which was published last month in the International Journal of Health Geographics.
The U.S. has approximately 1,500 beds available for burn victims, and "most of those beds are already occupied," the study said.
All of the hospitals in downtown areas would be destroyed by the immediate blast, causing an overflow of patients at the ones left standing.
Scared yet?
There also would be a severe lack of respirators, which tens of thousands of victims would need. More importantly, there would be massive displacement of medically-trained professionals, Dallas said.
Be the first to comment on this story