Court orders UGA to clear name of former journalism dean (w/court order)
JOANN ANDERSON
Issue date: 3/5/09 Section: News
| |
| |
|
In documents filed Tuesday, the court adopted a recommendation to "grant [John Soloski's] request ... for rescinding [the University's] findings and expunging from [the University's] records any indication that [Soloski] violated the University's sexual harassment policy."
In 2005, the Office of Legal Affairs investigated claims filed by Janet Jones Kendall, a former Grady College employee, against Soloski, then dean of Grady College, which claimed he commented on her "assets," according to documents.
Soloski was found in violation of the Non-Discrimination and Anti-Harassment Policy in June 2005. He resigned as dean and now teaches class.
Soloski later filed a lawsuit against University President Michael Adams and the Board of Regents. A federal judge recommended the University clear Soloski of charges last year.
"Dr. Soloski has always contended that he's been falsely accused of sexual harassment and again, today, we have learned that this is what occurred," said Brandon Hornsby, Soloski's lawyer, in an interview Wednesday. "Hopefully the University of Georgia will admit what they did was wrong, accept responsibility and seek a resolution with Dr. Soloski."
"The case was always not just about clearing his name, but making sure no one at the University was subject to false accusations. It was an important goal, and I think today was a very big step to accomplishing that goal."
The court cleared the University in several other counts of the lawsuit. The court found UGA did not breach Soloski's contract as dean since he chose to resign nor did it deny Soloski his right to due process when he left his deanship, according to the documents. The court also ordered the denial of Soloski's count that President Michael Adams violated his constitutional right to due process by rejecting Soloski's appeal of the harassment violation.
"It was a 70-page order and there were 12 main points in the case," said Tom Jackson, University vice president for public affairs. "The order affirmed the previous nine points in favor of the University and the three rulings in this latest order ruled that Soloski was a 9-month employee, not a 12-month employee, so there will be no further compensation from the University.
"All of this is still in litigation - each party may appeal any of the rulings at this point," Jackson added. "We will continue to protect legal interests of the University."
One count remains in dispute. Soloski claims the University violated his right to privacy, based on the contents of a story in the Atlanta Journal-Constitution revealing he was involved in a sexual harassment investigation.
The court ordered a deposition for Kelly Simmons, the former AJC reporter and current University employee, to reveal the identities of sources she used in a June 2005 story about the Office of Legal Affairs' investigation. The deposition was ordered last month after Simmons' and the AJC's requests for dropping the subpoena were denied. The release of identities would aid Soloski's claim that the University invaded his privacy during the 2005 investigation, the documents state.
Simmons and the AJC have objected to the court's deposition order, and the court has yet to make a final ruling. Depending on the ruling, the right to privacy count may head to trial.
Spring Break

Viewing Comments 1 - 5 of 7
James
posted 3/05/09 @ 9:06 AM EST
So ......... will the University obey or defy the court order?
Prof Dawg
posted 3/06/09 @ 10:31 AM EST
My my my ... last year the red and black had the campus whipped into a frenzy ... now, this ruling and ??? where are all the comments?
no apologies?
so, red and black, have you learned that as journalists not to believe everything legal affairs or the university wants you to believe?
ever heard of investigation? or is it just more fun to print your outrage based on hearsay and ill formed opinion?
YourTake?
posted 3/06/09 @ 10:38 AM EST
HERE IS WHAT A PREVIOUS EDITORIAL BOARD AT RED AND BLACK WROTE (OUR TAKE) GOTTA NEW TAKE??
"Will young women feel ill at ease with a professor who has been found to be a harasser? Will Soloski be paranoid that anything he says or does could be taken as a repeat offense?
It doesn't seem like an ideal arrangement for either. (Continued…)
Grady friend
posted 3/06/09 @ 2:49 PM EST
Prof Dawg....Soloski....same ole sexist, drunk.
Sara
posted 3/07/09 @ 9:48 AM EST
Time to prosecute and / or countersue the ccunt who made false charges.
Post a Comment