Student fee, raising $180K a year, would support sustainability office
DALLAS DUNCAN
Issue date: 3/25/09 Section: News
|
The referendum, a joint effort between Go Green Alliance and the Student Government Association, proposes to create an Office of Sustainability to be funded by a $3 student fee each semester.
The money would go toward the salary of an officer who would promote sustainability, organize an operating budget and provide student internships and grants from the office, said University senior Andrew Durso, co-chair of Go Green Alliance, in a phone interview Tuesday.
Durso said the $3 cost was chosen based on calculations averaging the cost of similar offices at other universities.
The HOPE Scholarship would not cover the fee because it would be assessed as a Student Activities charge, Durso said.
Referendum voting is open on Oasis through Thursday.
The office would coordinate all the University's efforts toward environmental sustainability and promote "education pedagogy," Durso said.
Education pedagogy would teach "students in all colleges that their major has an impact on sustainability," he said. The efforts would also extend into faculty research.
The Office of Sustainability originated in an open forum sponsored by the Go Green Alliance. After approaching administrators and learning there was no funding for such an office, Go Green Alliance went to SGA with their proposal.
"The initiative itself, and trying to make the campus more sustainable, is something SGA has been involved in," said Ed Mirecki, the associate director of student affairs and SGA adviser, in a phone interview Tuesday.
Mirecki explained two processes for adding a referendum to the SGA ballot.
The first option, he said, is to petition 10 percent of the student body and present the proposal and student signatures to SGA.
The second method, used by Go Green Alliance, is to propose the referendum to the SGA Senate, and achieve approval by a two-thirds majority vote.
Odum School of Ecology Senator Chris Morphis proposed The Office of Sustainability referendum, which SGA passed Feb. 17 - but not without debate and careful consideration, Mirecki said.
Spring Break
Viewing Comments 1 - 10 of 12
Thanks but No Thanks
posted 3/25/09 @ 8:16 AM EST
Yes, UGA definitely needs to work on becoming more environmentally friendly.
However, the creation of another bureaucratic office that seems designed to serve as a babysitter/educator is not the answer. (Continued…)
Absolutely.... Not
posted 3/25/09 @ 11:25 AM EST
The only thing more ridiculous than the New Deal Party's signs claiming that "the new deal worked for America" is the hope that a student fee will make this campus "greener. (Continued…)
Hell no!!
posted 3/25/09 @ 11:39 AM EST
I dont care if it is $3, I dont want to pay that. I just finished paying the univeristy a $100 freaking dollar bailout. So no!
Ben Around
posted 3/25/09 @ 11:57 AM EST
Having a sustainability office at animal agriculture UGA is like the KKK having an office of human rights.
ron
posted 3/25/09 @ 1:02 PM EST
The new deal didnt work, it made the great depression drag on much longer than it did for the rest of the world just like oboma current plan is going to do. (Continued…)
one frappuccino
posted 3/25/09 @ 2:31 PM EST
I support the environmental movement, but agree with a previous post that these initiatives should not be shoved down people's throats. I do not think this program would achieve that. (Continued…)
George Dean
posted 3/25/09 @ 3:30 PM EST
You're kidding me right. We've lost all sense of reality.
student
posted 3/25/09 @ 5:10 PM EST
Fuck new fees. Cut Adams' and the Regents' salary if you need more money.
and this is why i said no to the new deal
posted 3/25/09 @ 8:59 PM EST
I voted no on this. Mostly because I don't see it having a lasting impact at UGA. There are better ways to go around it, and while three dollars may just be three dollars to some of you, I'm not willing to pay for something that I don't see working or a priority right now. (Continued…)
Teddy K
posted 3/25/09 @ 10:44 PM EST
Freakin A you guys, Brittany Cassell is so freaking hot.
Post a Comment