Quantcast The Red and Black
College Media Network

The Red and Black

Search the Archives

 

HOT TOPICS: Tate abortion images too graphic

CAITLIN BYRNES

Issue date: 4/1/09 Section: Opinions
  • Print
  • Email
  • Page 1 of 1
CAITLIN BYRNES
CAITLIN BYRNES

Although I am an adamant anti-abortionist, I find the visual scare tactics of Justice For All distasteful and ineffective.

The point of the group, according to one of the activists, is to increase public awareness through displays, pamphlets and one-on-one conversations. This is an excellent goal - I wish there were more groups who came to campus to discuss the reality of abortion.

Each year, millions of abortions are performed and doctors are not required to discuss with patients the extensive mental, physical and emotional health risks associated with the procedure. These women, most of whom are younger than 25, often have no idea what really happens until it is too late. This is exactly what happened to Norma McCorvey, the women involved in the landmark Roe v. Wade case that legalized abortion. Since the case and her enlightenment of the implications of abortion, McCorvey has become a pro-life advocate.

In her book, "Won By Love," McCorvey wrote, "No more of this first trimester, second trimester, third trimester stuff. Abortion - at any point - was wrong. It was so clear. Painfully clear."

I want wholeheartedly to prevent young women such as McCorvey from making a rash decision in a time of distress and regretting it the rest of their lives.

However, the aborted fetus photos make many students avoid Tate Plaza when Justice For All is there, killing the group's chance of disseminating important information.

People have to be comfortable approaching the display for them to learn anything.

Justice For All needs to realize that though many women in this age bracket unfortunately will face an abortion decision, most aren't facing the decision at that exact moment and don't want to be visually accosted. Often they want to talk about this subject, but no one wants to be judged and lectured. The group's method comes across as extreme instead of informed.

Instead of huge scary photos, Justice For All could have large displays that welcome passersby to learn more, and then have pamphlets with their coveted aborted fetus pictures for those who wish to see them. This different approach would reach more students, superseding its goal.

The activists claim the large pictures stir discussion about abortion, when really all they do is make people trash the "crazy pro-life people."

I don't want to be associated with the "crazy pro-life people" because there is nothing crazy about trying to save the lives of innocent people - from fetuses to middle aged women.

In my conversation with one of the activists Tuesday, she told me the group is changing its displays to be less graphically disturbing.

Until this change occurs, the group remains an embarrassment to the pro-life community.

- Caitlin Byrnes is a news staff writer

for The Red & Black.

Page 1 of 1

Article Tools

Viewing Comments 1 - 10 of 41

John

posted 4/01/09 @ 9:00 AM EST

Thank you!

I have gone to great lengths to avoid the plaza over the past two days after being traumatized by the images Monday morning. Instead of engaging me in discussion, the activists simply turned me away from the area. (Continued…)

James

posted 4/01/09 @ 9:43 AM EST

The truth hurts doesn't it? The display did it's job.

(1 reply)   Details   Reply to this comment

Steve

posted 4/01/09 @ 10:43 AM EST

Regardless of whether a particular display is upsetting to some or not, the point is that this is part of the "cost" of having a free society. To censor expression of ideas based on such slippery and subjective bases as "offensive," "graphic" and the like, or to marginalize and silence the speaker by pejorative and ad hominem attacks ("bigot," "extremist," "homophobe" and the like) is to gut our Constitutional right of free speech and expression. (Continued…)

(2 replies)   Details   Reply to this comment

Sinclair

posted 4/01/09 @ 11:28 AM EST

Shock tactics are for those who can't think of a better way to get points across. How about trying a little harder next time.

(1 reply)   Details   Reply to this comment

passing by

posted 4/01/09 @ 12:01 PM EST

When I walked by the Tate Center there was a yellow school bus parked right outside of Memorial Hall. I don't want to think about who could have possibly been on that bus and what they were forced to see when they drove by. (Continued…)

Nick

posted 4/01/09 @ 12:21 PM EST

That display is clearly not contributing to an intellectual debate.

I'm pretty sure we can all agree that we have seen those images before. Certainly several times before entering college. (Continued…)

(5 replies)   Details   Reply to this comment

Katie

posted 4/01/09 @ 1:24 PM EST

While I am pro-choice, I completely respect those of opposing opinion and understand their rites to demonstrate. The fist amendment gives us the rite to demonstrate but many people forget about the fact that all of the amendments give us privileges as long as we don't hurt others. (Continued…)

Chelsea

posted 4/01/09 @ 1:50 PM EST

I think the graphic photos are needed to show the young ladies what they are doing to their child and their bodies. I agree with James, the display did its job. (Continued…)

(4 replies)   Details   Reply to this comment

Nick 2

posted 4/01/09 @ 3:33 PM EST

I am adamantly pro-choice, but I am also adamantly pro-freedom of speech. These people have the right to show graphic pictures if they want to.

Colleen

posted 4/01/09 @ 5:02 PM EST

I don't think this article is trying to argue that Justice for All should not be allowed to display their images. Obviously, they have the right to say or show whatever they want. (Continued…)

Post a Comment

  • NOTE: Email address will not be published

Type your comment below (html not allowed)

  I understand posting spam or other comments that are unrelated to this article will cause my comment to be flagged for deletion and possibly cause my IP address to be permanently banned from this server.

 

 

Advertisement

Poll

Hmm, what to make of Kentucky vs. Georgia:
Submit Vote

View Results



Advertisement