Quantcast The Red and Black
College Media Network

The Red and Black

Search the Archives

 

'Confederate History Month' ludicrous

ALEX BUSKO

Issue date: 4/2/09 Section: Opinions
  • Print
  • Email
  • Page 1 of 1
<b>ALEX BUSKO</b>
ALEX BUSKO

It still strikes me for a moment whenever I see the Stars and Bars flying. It's not that it offends me, a white Southerner, it's that it offends so many millions of other people.

And I'm not saying I perpetually walk on eggshells to avoid offending the sensibilities of all other humans, but for a group of people who so willingly boast of their "hospitality" and "manners," it's kind of ironic that so many Southerners still feel a need to fly the Confederate flag.

My mother's side of the family settled in Virginia well before the Civil War, and three of my own ancestors fought in the Confederate Army. I was born and raised in the South and despite all this - despite all my love for the South and the pride I have in the place I come from - I've never felt compelled to announce this to the world by wearing or waving a Confederate flag.

I always hear people say, "It's about heritage, not hate." But the only problem with this line of reasoning is that so many decades of our Southern heritage revolved around hate.

For more than 100 years, our Southern heritage and the very history of the South were polluted and marred by the way we treated blacks. Generations of my family treated an entire race of human beings like domestic animals - intellectually and genetically inferior things that could basically be bought and put to work.

The Sons of Confederate Veterans and other organizations have made it their mission to rewrite the history books.

As a Chicago Tribune article put it earlier this month: "The negative image [of the Confederacy] has long angered some white Southerners, particularly those whose ancestors died in the Civil War. In their view, the war is a source of Southern pride. In recent years, they have sought to redefine the Confederacy in multicultural terms, saying that Jews, Latinos and blacks fought for the South. They argue that the war had little, if anything, to do with slavery."

Historians leap to disagree. And a speech delivered just before the Civil War by Confederate Vice President Alexander Stephens explicitly says, "African slavery" was the "immediate cause of the late rupture and present revolution."

Despite the rebranding attempts of the SCV and others, the Confederate States of America weren't a damn melting pot, chock full of "Jews, Latinos and blacks," all shouldering rifles to protect the South. It was a Confederacy composed almost exclusively of white men hell-bent on crippling our Union and preserving their way of life and the reprehensible institution of slavery.

Today, we call groups like that terrorist organizations.

I thought I had ergot poisoning when I read that the Georgia Senate recently passed a bill that will officially make April Georgia's Confederate Heritage and History Month, assuming it's not struck down by the House.

According to the bill, which passed by a ridiculous 48-2 margin, the purpose is "to honor, observe, and celebrate the Confederate States of America, its history, those who served in its armed forces and government, and all those millions of its citizens of various races and ethnic groups and religions who contributed in sundry and myriad ways to the cause which they held so dear…"

Sen. John Bulloch (R-Ochlocknee), one of the bill's sponsors, said the observance would be a boost to the state's tourism.

The bill encourages governments, schools, businesses and citizens to celebrate and participate in programs throughout the month. It's really no different than Black History Month, Bulloch said.

This guy must have stolen a fistful of Rush Limbaugh's OxyContin and washed it down with a bottle of Rebel Yell. In what parallel universe are Confederate history and black history even slightly comparable?

I'm not saying we as Southerners shouldn't honor and celebrate our history and our heritage. The South's history is too important and rich with lessons for us to lose touch with.

But the history of the Confederacy is not the history of the South, and when we celebrate the history of the Confederacy, we celebrate things we should be condemning and praying remain the fossils of our past.

- Alex Busko is a news staff writer for

The Red & Black.

Page 1 of 1

Article Tools

Viewing Comments 1 - 10 of 226

Jonathan

posted 4/02/09 @ 6:33 AM EST

You have no clue what you are talking about.

(2 replies)   Details   Reply to this comment

Alumna 06

posted 4/02/09 @ 7:27 AM EST

What about Black History month? Hispanic heritage month? What makes these different from having a Confederate History month? I am from the north and all my ancestors fought for the north, but I see nothing wrong with this proposal. (Continued…)

(3 replies)   Details   Reply to this comment

abower

posted 4/02/09 @ 7:44 AM EST

agreed jonathan, this guy just lost a lot of credibility when he tried to throw in his anti-conservative jokes. haha, i couldnt finish reading this without laughing. (Continued…)

(3 replies)   Details   Reply to this comment

murph t

posted 4/02/09 @ 7:47 AM EST

Yes, heaven forbid the dwindling majority be able to celebrate and reflect.

What about the families of those who didn't own slaves? Mine sure didn't. (Continued…)

(1 reply)   Details   Reply to this comment

A little history lesson

posted 4/02/09 @ 8:32 AM EST

Alex,
Let me give you a little history lesson. First of all, less than 1% of all people living in the Confederate States of America owned slaves. Second, less than 1% of those slave owners owned more than 2. (Continued…)

(7 replies)   Details   Reply to this comment

Russell

posted 4/02/09 @ 8:42 AM EST

I don't necessarily disagree with the idea that Confederacy History Month is unwarranted.

But comparing the Confederacy to a terrorist organization? The Confederacy was an attempt to separate with an existing nation state and establish a new independent nation state in its place. (Continued…)

(3 replies)   Details   Reply to this comment

Glenda Falls

posted 4/02/09 @ 8:51 AM EST

Your first sentence shows how very ill-informed and uneducated you are - unless of course you see the First National Flag (the Stars and Bars) flying a lot where you live. (Continued…)

(2 replies)   Details   Reply to this comment

Carey

posted 4/02/09 @ 8:56 AM EST

Do you even know what flag the phrase "stars and Bars" is referring to? That is unless the current state flag of Georgia offends you. And also, if you'll do your proper research you will find that there were plenty of influential Jewish and Catholic Southerners. (Continued…)

(1 reply)   Details   Reply to this comment

Josh

posted 4/02/09 @ 9:11 AM EST

Who the heck is this guy getting his history lesson from? The "stars and bars" is the Confederate flag...really??? Who's feeding you this information? If you want to be a credible writer, you really need to work on getting FACTS. (Continued…)

(1 reply)   Details   Reply to this comment

Whatever

posted 4/02/09 @ 9:19 AM EST

Although it is indeed true that very few Southerners owned slaves, the whole purpose of the Confederacy -- controlled by the rich landowning plantocracy -- was to defend slavery and create a slave-owning republic. (Continued…)

(4 replies)   Details   Reply to this comment

Post a Comment

  • NOTE: Email address will not be published

Type your comment below (html not allowed)

  I understand posting spam or other comments that are unrelated to this article will cause my comment to be flagged for deletion and possibly cause my IP address to be permanently banned from this server.

 

 

Advertisement

Poll

Hmm, what to make of Kentucky vs. Georgia:
Submit Vote

View Results



Advertisement