Debate necessary in race questions
CHRIS CHIEGO
Issue date: 4/23/09 Section: Opinions
|
Last week, I finally submitted a column on race and the public reaction was all too predictable - personal attacks against me, condescending declarations that a white male should never write about race and little actual debate on the merits of my argument. But behind that ugly front, I've seen many signs of hope for the kind of productive dialogue I called for.
The accusations levied against me were simply preposterous. For instance, apparently I have a trust fund (in my dreams), have never been part of a minority population (incorrect many times over) and blamed minorities for segregation (read the actual column).
The fact that some individuals found the need to resort to slander and stereotyping was disappointing, but sadly not surprising. I was particularly disturbed to hear reports that professors in various classes called me ignorant and illogical as well as the product of a racist white society, but then refused to actually address my argument.
I am open to talking with those who disagree with me and would appreciate the opportunity to explain how my experiences informed my opinion. Sniping from the sidelines with academic jargon or making groundless assaults on my character is neither respectful nor productive - it simply proves my point that white students are effectively banned from discussing racial issues.
On a more encouraging note, last Monday I served on a panel discussing perceptions of African Americans in the media. As the meeting ended, I started talking with a crowd of about 50 students about my article.
We ended up having an insightful 45-minute discussion about a variety of topics from my column. Many of these students agreed with most or part of what I had to say, and even those who disagreed with me commended me for speaking out.
All students, regardless of race, have the right to offer informed opinions on racial issues. I strongly urge students interested in improving the racial tension at this University to openly engage their fellow students in these discussions.
Your name may be run through the mud by those vocal few who oppose open dialogue and reasoned arguments, but I firmly believe that this campus will be better off for it.
I still stand by my view that separation through racially-based organizations and events is harmful, but I look forward in the coming weeks to discussing the roles and impact of those programs.
Regardless of whether or not you agree with my view, I hope that you respect my right to express it.
- Chris Chiego is a senior from Memphis majoring in international affairs and history.
Spring Break

Viewing Comments 1 - 6 of 11
buzzkill
posted 4/23/09 @ 10:20 AM EST
chiegs = class act. for the record, i don't agree that the university is tacitly supporting segregation via funding of groups and activities geared toward various racial minorities. (Continued…)
zaid
posted 4/23/09 @ 10:28 AM EST
youre a rich, obnoxious, spoiled douchebag and no one likes you Chris.
Jay
posted 4/23/09 @ 11:50 AM EST
"I still stand by my view that separation through racially-based organizations and events is harmful."
Since, I have never seen you around on campus and don't know you personally, I can't accurately judge your character, but that statement is completely ignorant. (Continued…)
RandB
Anonymous Author
posted 4/23/09 @ 1:41 PM EST
To claim the ideas of others are simply a product of ignorance is to deny that human experience that doesn't correspond with your own is of any worth. (Continued…)
The Real Zaid
posted 4/23/09 @ 11:43 PM EST
I don't know why R&B can't password protect names (i registered and everything) but occasionally someone else posts with my name. I don't know why, maybe to make me look like an ass. (Continued…)
Seven42
Me
posted 4/24/09 @ 11:47 AM EST
The purpose of these groups is to open dialogue, not to keep anyone out. There is no ethnic or cultural requirement for anyone to be in any of these organizations. (Continued…)
Post a Comment