Insensitive writer hears the wrong cries
JASON BUTT
Issue date: 4/28/09 Section: Opinions
|
And that's fine. It's OK for him to believe this. I understand why he feels this way.
But what I don't understand is why he's only hearing political cries. In trying to defend America's gun laws, he wrote a piece that reads like a last-second effort to fill space on The Red & Black's Opinions page.
And due to the diction of the piece, there is no valuable commentary presented. Yes, people who use guns to kill people are the ones at fault. Yes, violent crime is down statistically. But the only cries Fitzpatrick heard after this horrific tragedy were from the other political spectrum than he agrees with?
Did he not hear cries from the Athens community mourning a second gun-related tragedy in a little more than a year (the first being the death of Athens native Eve Carson in Chapel Hill, N.C.)? Did he not hear cries from the victims' friends and family?
What about Marie Bruce's two children? Is anyone crying for them?
And what does the NRA have to do with this shooting? So, 250 million people own guns. That's part of a defense not to enact gun control? Would Fitzpatrick selectively hear Ted Nugent's cries if Barack Obama helped sign a gun control bill into a law?
And why is the differing point of view "blah blah blah?" The only "blah blah blah" I'm reading seems like an obvious preemptive defense: The shooter should take the blame and not the guns. Really?
In the wake of what happened, what weight does either side of this issue hold? Some people will agree, some will disagree. In the end, three people are dead and a killer is on the loose.
I learned a valuable lesson not too long ago: In times of tragedy, a bigger picture displays - one that clearly shows life is too short to be taken for granted.
I can't fault Fitzpatrick for his opinion. And I know Fitzpatrick well enough to know he didn't mean to offend anyone in this time of horror and grief.
But the tone of his words and the cries he heard struck a chord with me.
After reading his column, I remembered the collective cries from the Athens and Chapel Hill communities at Athens First United Methodist Church last March, mourning the loss a promising young woman the rest of the world painfully won't see - murdered by people with guns.
Fitzpatrick may not have heard those cries, and maybe he's fortunate for it. Death changes the people associated with the departed.
And though gun control is an issue for debate, now might not be the best time to raise the topic given the circumstances - especially in reference to hearing people cry.
- Jason Butt is the sports editor for The Red & Black.
Spring Break

Viewing Comments 1 - 5 of 8
bandofotters
posted 4/28/09 @ 7:30 PM EST
When a person abuses his freedoms, I find it appalling that there is an immediate outcry to take away the freedoms of everyone. Looking to the government for a solution to the level of violence that exists in this country is too difficult so let's pass more meaningless gun control laws. (Continued…)
what?
posted 4/28/09 @ 9:45 PM EST
bandofotters,
what are you even talking about that is relevant to what the author said?
Amanda
posted 4/29/09 @ 12:49 PM EST
bandofotters obviously didn't read the article.
Jason, your reaction was the same as mind. People on BOTH sides of the gun control debate do their side a disservice when they immediately run to use a tragedy as proof to bolster their political leanings. (Continued…)
Mike Kennedy
posted 5/04/09 @ 9:59 PM EST
I will submit that no person has ever been killed by a gun, rather they were done in by a person using a gun. Would it be better if they were pushed out of a window?
Frank
posted 5/05/09 @ 3:28 PM EST
If a person wants to kill somebody, they are going to find a way regardless if they have access to a gun. Yes, guns make it easier, but a murderer is going to follow through with their intentions regardless. (Continued…)
Post a Comment